Hey, it is disappointing when I get a follower perk that sucks, but I try not to start personal relationships with employees and have no problem issuing pink slips or demoting them to gate guard. Maybe you have to evaluate if you want to spend that time at all and whether you want a follower if there is a random chance they might not be exactly, perfectly what you want. If it is the grind and time spent that you're complaining about, well then I can't do anything about it. I have had good followers go bad, I just fired their butts and looked for suitable replacements. If you don't like your follower and their perks, break that friendship, move on and learn to accept it. If all the negative perks are removed then you're always a winner, why stop there? Why not remove the perks that give only a +1 or +3 and always give +5? Did you ever see that Twilight Zone, where the gambler thinks he is in heaven because he always wins?Īnd yes, you feed your thrall the best food to raise the stats you think are the best, that's the precautions you take and beyond that, well you just have to take your chances. So yeah, I still maintain that negative perks should be removed. Wich conan doesn't let you do, your thrall have negative perks? deal with it. This is just absurd.Īnd third, I find the athlete exemple not really relevent because if a trainer sees a weakness developing in his athlete, he will give said athlete the proper training to correct that weakness. Second, think about combination of perks that cancel each other, like in my exemple. What you're looking for is strentgh and vitality. However there are some point I would like too precise įirst, I would not call it a positive outcome when your melee fighter get only bonus in survival and agility. I mean, why would a fighter, who is training in melee start to develop archer perks, and vice versa. Originally posted by Fast Johnny:The last thing you said makes perfect sense to me.
Although, it might not be a bad idea for the tables to nerf the negatives to a lower level if the followers are eating right and getting exercise. I don't think it would add more fun to the game to be assured a positive outcome. As far as Dalinsia, considering she is one of the best in the game, even with some negative outcomes, she is still a cold blooded killer. I know it is disappointing, but a guaranteed positive outcome wouldn't make the game more fun, just more predictable and cheesy. Sometimes you just have to accept that the athlete might not have what it takes mentally as well as physically. A coach can't expect every athlete under their tutelage to become an Olympic competitor. It's just dumb.Īs far as the perks that offer negative traits or disappointing traits, well.I kind of see that as something that a trainer has to live with. The last thing you said makes perfect sense to me. Ideally, I would also like if fighter got a 0% chance of getting an accuracy perk, and archer a 0% chance of getting a strength perk.
Resourceful skulker: -5 strenght, +8 survival I would really like if funcom just remove all the following perks that give a malus:Įxpert survivalist: -3 strenght, +5 survival It's alreday bad enough when she start with "perseverance: +3 survival" so then, when she get "deadeye: -3 strength, +5 accuracy" and then "high-strung: +5 agility, -3 accuracy", it's just horrible! A melee fighter that got a malus in strength, it's main stat, to the profit of a bonus in accuracy that's then negate by a malus in accuracy! Absolute golden ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥! It just feel like a complete waste of time. Now it's time to level her and discover the joy of random perks. So you were looking for Dalinsia Snowhunter for while now, and finally got your hand on her.
0 kommentar(er)
